41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Liked it, Nice, Better than Alternatives
29 April 2023
I'm glad I saw it, but expected MORE when I read critic reviews who were all IN. It's definitely a fun walk down memory lane to adolescence in the 1970's, but its relevance today escapes me, and I'm surprised it ever got made for that reason. I compliment the young actress, who played Margaret. Other actors, like Rachel McAdams and Kathy Bates were under-challenged in their roles. Plot mixture of adolescent angst & religious choice was awkward, so neither got the attention it deserved. And, Kathy Bates character as Jewish grandmother was stereotypical and heavy-handed. She's a better actor when she plays closer to home. Go see if nothing better.
29 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fabelmans (2022)
10/10
Highly Enjoyable Underrated Gem
16 January 2023
We loved The Fabelman's, thank you Steven Spielberg for sharing your coming-of-age story. I recommend it highly for any movie fan who treasures well-crafted films showcasing believable writing and superb acting, especially by Michelle Williams as Mom, and Paul Dano as mature son, Sammy Fabelman, aka Spielberg. Every scene in this movie shows the creativity and humor of its director, Spielberg, who, following a lifetime of creative genius in entertaining us with amazing movies to enjoy over and over- reveals some of the family and other obstacles he went through to get there. We watched the dreary Golden Globes show only to see if he would win Best Director for Fabelmans, and he did!
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Bad, Not Good
23 July 2022
Based on a popular novel with an intriguing storyline, this could have been a smashing film if it had been constructed better. It lacks intensity by not showing the devastating results of being an abandoned child, lonely, scared and hungry. It seems to gloss over all of that, and so we miss her transformation because she's shown as always being all right. I would have loved to see a wild child as main actor exhibiting all the angst of being unloved, and then she transforms in to a strong woman.

Getting back to my headline, there is beautiful photography and a sense of nature we don't often see.
190 out of 288 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Belfast (2021)
10/10
Perfect Ten
21 November 2021
If you're as sick of nihilistic movies - full of non-stop computer-generated destruction and loathsome characters - as I am, go see Belfast. Bravo Kenneth Branagh! This is a beautiful film based on his experience growing up in Northern Ireland when civil strife threatened lives and unsettled peaceful co-existence of communities with different beliefs and their relationship with ruling England. While we're familiar with the part the IRA played in Irish history, it's novel to view it through the eyes of a young kid called "Buddy", Branagh's alter-ego. I don't always like child actors - too precious and unnatural - but this young kid, who plays Buddy, is so real as he reacts to what's going on in his young life. He's featured among a very talented, largely unknown cast of fellow actors, which makes it all seem more real vs. Another Hollywood production. The exception is the Grandmother, beautifully portrayed by Judi Dench. Shot in black & white, with a 60's music score, and intercuts to memorable TV shows & popular films of the times, Belfast transports us back to another time under its competent writing, direction & acting.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Courier (2020)
7/10
The Courier Delivers
22 March 2021
This was a pretty good movie, made astonishing, because of the valor of its real life heroes, Russian agent Penkovsky and British businessman Wynne. It was intriguing because I was unfamiliar with their story, and had no idea how it would end. But, there are better spy thrillers out there than this one because the director was focused more on telling an implausible (true) story, rather than making a great spy thriller. For instance, there are many quick-cut scenes with music score but without dialogue intended to convey gradual unravelling of subterfuge rather than detailing events with actor interactions. I think that lessened the suspense we love in spy thrillers. Still, there is strong acting from Merab Ninidze as Penkovsky, who I've never heard of or seen before, but he really reminded me of a famous actor from the past. Benedict Cumberbatch as Wynne turns in a good performance, but actor who played American CIA agent Emily was not credible. There's a jarring shift in tone and subject matter that occurs halfway through the film that, with better direction . could have been more of an evolving process. I still think a good film and head & shoulders above the alternatives.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Emma. (2020)
8/10
Emma is Gorgeous Funny
7 March 2020
We loved this movie! The actors do a great job balancing the sensibility of the 1800's society with humor over its absurdity. High marks to the director and screenwriter for capturing Emma's author, Jane Austen, so beautifully. As much as we enjoyed character portrayals, we equally loved the scene design, costumes, location settings and staging. There are numerous scenes that show subtle touches of romances blossoming, especially a dance sequence at a ball held for visiting son Franklin Churchill. And overall, there is the fun the audience gets from watching an abundance of communication miscues and their consequences. Last, but not least, Emma actress and several other characters had very large eyes which we get to see express so much suppressed emotion that reflect the times.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1917 (2019)
10/10
Absolutely Brilliant!
19 January 2020
What a magical 2 hours this movie delivers...and it goes by fast! I have never seen a war movie that better telegraphs what it's like for young men in combat, and tells the story through characters you care about. While the horrors of WW1 are there, images are darkened so you can keep your eyes open rather than shutting out in-your-face gore. The acting is superb, soundtrack gorgeous, and cinematography amazing. All four of us loved the film, saying after to each other, "everyone should see this", and feeling inspired to read up on WW1 history.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Little Women (2019)
5/10
Snooze City
29 December 2019
There is nothing new under the sun with this umpteenth remake of "Little Women". I took my 20 year old daughter to see it because she loved watching a much older version with June Allyson as Jo March and a talented cast when she was a young girl. It was a staple at our house every Christmas and a sentimental favorite. When this new version ended after a very long 2 hours or so, we both said "meh", and I regretted spending $50 on tickets and treats. Because most of us already know the simple story written by Louisa May Alcott from our youth, it's tedious to view continuous flashbacks throughout the movie, which add nothing but length to the film. The many location shots are attractive, but so many characters are miscast - Amy March especially, who is supposed to be a beautiful, vain, selfish creature, but ends up having more "balls" than sister Jo March, is a real turn-off with her bulldog personna and combative low voice. Mom March (Laura Dern) is a real stretch lacking authentic warmth and maturity, Aunt March played by Meryl Streep turns in a wink-wink old lady performance without a shred of empathy. And sister March played by Emma Watson is just "there" without the magical special effects of Harry Potter. On the other hand, March sister Beth is believable as the fragile, ill-fated member of the family, and Saoirse Ronan is good as Joe but lacks the passion I've seen from her in other movies. Wonder if she was directed to tone her intensity down to let other characters be developed more? There's quite a few scenes she's not even in, which hurts the portrayal of Jo March's rebellion and reconciliation as intended in Alcott's book. In that vein, there are only a few short scenes of Jo's New York escape from domestic struggles and her conflicts with a burgeoning relationship with a much older, "foreign" professor. There is so little attention paid to their tender, fractious connection as boardinghouse friends, it's a real flaw in the movie because that's where Jo in the novel discovers herself apart from her family. I won't say anything about the ending, wishing to avoid spoilers, but overall recommend that if you loved the book and previous film versions, you might want to skip this one.
17 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A "Jewel"
21 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
We loved Clint Eastwood's film about misjudged Richard Jewell's calculated trashing by the FBI and the media which robbed him of his actual heroism providing notice of bomb at 1996 Olympics and urging people to safety. The actor Hauser who plays Jewell deserves an Oscar big-time. He is magnificent. His attorney played by Sam Rockwell forms a very convincing, necessarily combative relationship with Jewell that enables him to stand up & be the hero he is. I always like Kathy Bates, actress who portrays Richard's mom, Bobby, and she has one scene that brought tears, but i like her better in other tough chick roles. Don't worry about the first few scenes setting the stage with people bopping around to Kenny Rogers stuff at Olympics venue, kind of fake, but trust me it gets a whole better when the bomb goes off! Intense film with some great performances, go see it!
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Book! Great Film!
15 August 2019
"The Art of Racing in the Rain" - no other book has ever made me laugh and cry out loud like this one and I questioned whether the movie version would do it justice...it totally did! The actors were superb, chemistry real, and there's so much wisdom Enzo the Dog Star imparts along the way. Through Enzo's thoughts and Denny's behavior, the analogy of successful car racing and life's challenges is made clear with vision and sensitivity. There is much to learn and cheer about in this movie with beautiful scenes of taking care of those we love and never giving up, despite the odds. We also get to see how everyone screws up from time to time but if they keep their eye on what they want and believe in, they win. And Enzo, who's always living in the present, goes "dormant" when he needs to avoid distraction of worrying about the past or future. Great stuff...I'm going to read the book again, and highly recommend this movie to anyone with a heart and soul.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Late Night (2019)
5/10
Soft Core PC Bias, Better Than TV News
16 June 2019
Lead actor Emma Thompson is too good for this lightweight PC flick, full stop.She does the best she can with a too simplistic script that never allows her to show her acting chops, but it's still good to see her once again after long absence. Mindy Kaling (who wrote script) plays an annoyingly righteous, bold warrior of diversity in the workplace, and occasionally was able to generate chuckles and empathy for her fearless entry into TV comedy writing. It's appealing to watch her confront the arrogant complacency of all white guy staff of comedy writers with naive honesty and pushiness about Emma Thompson's character sharing all through social media marketing to improve the show's ratings. But, here's where the comparison of "Late Night" with "Devil Wears Prada" and Meryl Streep's performance as successful business icon with life falling apart fails. In Prada, you were presented with a meaningful choice between being driven to becoming soft around the edges - some choose one way, some choose another. There is no tension in Late Night's outcome.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vice (I) (2018)
4/10
Political Propaganda
10 January 2019
I loved "The Big Short" film by same director, but similar tactics using humor as cut-ins and narration failed to meet that standard. Way too long, and way too heavy-handed in making every scene an indictment of Dick Cheney as villain extraordinaire who singlehandedly and intentionally connived with his cohort to start the Iraq war. Anyone with a brain who lived through 9/11 and the aftermath knows it was much more complex than that. If this film attempted to show the multi-faceted situation, including poor intelligence by government agencies, majority of Congress voting "yes" to get rid of Sadam Hussein and start a war, and unbridled emotional response to an unexpected and devastating attack, this would have been a more factual film that the audience could get involved in. It could have been a great movie, rather than a biased, politically motivated exercise that used a hammer to blame rather than to learn and understand. Slides were used toward the end to put the nail in the coffin in case the audience missed the point, and became more propaganda than involving cinema. That said, actors were very good, especially Amy Adams as Lynne Cheney, who was a far more interesting person than I ever knew...would have been great to focus more on her family background and achievements...Steve Carrell as Donald Rumsfeld...and Christian Bale as Dick Cheney, who was good, but sometimes seemed to be involved with creating the character than being the character.
13 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
5 stars for PJ Travers Story, Not for Mediocre Re-make
30 December 2018
I gave this movie a "5"...not for the acting, not for the music, not for the singing, not for the direction...but because the PJ Travers storyline is creative, has heart and delivers a good message to kids and families. Wish I could say the same for this re-make of a cherished 1964 film that over the years, entered our hearts, minds and memories as we can still sing many of the songs made famous by the original. That didn't happen with this one, no one cheering, no one humming or upbeat, over the moon as we left the theater. Seeing this one made us realize how incredibly talented Julie Andrews, Dick Van Dyke, the entire cast and director were, they played their parts with large personalities wearing their hearts on their sleeves to make this fantasy touch kids and adults in a joyful, fun-filled way. The re-make fails to move us in that magical, memorable way. This Mary is arrogant and snarky lacking the vocal and acting talent to stir feelings, and Jack the Lamplighter tries hard to be Gene Kelly, but also lacks the acting chops, dancing and personality needed for memorable, funny character role. The only stars in this one were the Banks family Dad and his sister who played their parts with heart.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awfully Bad With Dismal Aftertaste
22 December 2018
I can't get past the strong Irish accent of lead actress, Saiorse Ronan as Mary! What a blunder of casting! Coupled with Margot Robbie's portrayal of Mary's cousin, Queen Elizabeth as a cartoon character, who garners no sympathy as a constant whiner, and turns over every ounce of her power to the scheming men around her. And Mary is no better, with scene after scene of starry blue-eyes gazing in to infinity with bravery, while she naively selects and submits to her drunken, debauched husband and trust of her flip-flopping brother, who connives to bring her down. What finished this film off for me was a gauzy curtain scene where the Queens have a showdown, despite the historical fact that they never met. Net takeaway: women are dummies abused by bad men.
166 out of 230 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Green Book (2018)
10/10
"Green Book" is Gold
25 November 2018
We loved Green Book along with the sold-out crowd who applauded loudly at the end. Based on true story of piano virtuoso, Don Shirley's road trip through the south during the 60's, the film pays tribute to his genius and courage as a black man who tries hard to soar above the ugliness of the times. The elegant trappings of his home and his success as a concert pianist leave him arrogantly cold and lonely, but his life begins to change when he hires Tony as his road trip driver. With a history as nightclub bouncer with Mafia connections in New York, Tony is the antithesis of Don's perfection and their evolving relationship on the road makes the movie soar above the ordinary and become magical. Viggo and Ali in the main roles are remarkable, and it's funny and endearing to watch them discard stereotypes and discover their mutual humanity. What we liked best is the movie teaches without preaching, it all unfolds through a myriad of natural moments between two great actors and a strong supporting cast. Top all this off with a really good soundtrack, excellent direction and production values, and an audience that laughed out loud and vigorously applauded at the end...this one is a true 10!
765 out of 880 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Story, Great Acting
3 September 2018
There is palpable tension throughout this movie as the agents from Israel have to tamp down their utter disgust for Eichmann, and desire for immediate revenge vs. their intention to deliver him up to the courts in Israel for trial. That tension makes the movie work because as viewers we cringe every time we see Eichmann's arrogance and lying eyes in flashbacks and in his kidnapped state. With the exception of Ben Kingsley, the actors were unknown to me, which enhanced the reality of this true story. The acting was excellent, and overall this film triggered emotions and reflections that over the past week I have not forgotten. Highly recommend for everyone, with exception of young kids.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Dancing in the Streets
29 April 2018
Cynics beware, you will not like this film! For everyone else, this is a highly entertaining couple of hours watching accomplished British actors portray characters of a certain age struggle with lost loves, challenging conditions, and betrayal. These charismatic actors, that seem familiar to us because we've seen them in "Harry Potter" movies or BBC mysteries, engaged me in a heartbeat. They are natural and present themselves with the badges of aging without apology. The scripting was too broad and cliche in the beginning scenes, but I stopped thinking about that as the story unfolded and touching scenes won me over. And there is something about watching people dance themselves out of misery that is so beautiful, it renews my spirit!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Eyes Open After "Chappaquidick"
7 April 2018
Growing up in the 60's, and a fan of JFK, I recall reading about this event as an unfortunate driving accident involving Kennedy's younger brother Ted and his secretary Mary Jo, who had been drinking at a party, and were probably having an affair. Seeing this movie, I can't help but think it should have been made a long time ago, as so much is revealed about what really happened. But, I still think this is an important film for my generation and younger people who tend to hero worship without uncovering the tragic flaws. It's also a dramatic eye-opener about the political machinations used to retain power. The actors are good, the story is compelling, but more time spent on Ted before and after would have made it better. And I came away sad about Mary Jo and her family in view of her dedication to a worthy cause.
107 out of 132 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Wrinkle in Time = Total Waste of Time
11 March 2018
There is no other movie in film history that comes even close to this one! Hands down, this is the winner in almost every category: Worst writing, Worst Acting, Worst editing (doubt did they did any)! It was like the very most banal Hallmark card greeting being stretched out to 2 hours with the most unimaginative dialogue being delivered on slower than slow setting, followed by loooooongest pauses in between to focus on unanimated eyes and expressions of actors delivering absolute drivel. What else can I say? I was wishing for tomatoes to throw at the screen whenever the young kid was on with his obnoxious little squeaky voice? That Chris Pine over-acted his buns off trying to emote something in this quagmire? It was embarrassing.Finally we got to see Oprah and Reese who teamed up to make yet another "girl warrior" film, and make money off the backs of sad women. They were as awful as this movie.
33 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Far From Hardy, but Entertaining...
17 May 2015
If you like period dramas and scenes of rural England, this is not a bad choice for two hours of entertainment. The camera work and musical score are good, as are some of the main and supporting actors, and the story moves along at a rapid pace, so long, boring scenes not the issue that they can be in period dramas. At the same time, I found this current dramatization of Thomas Hardy's 1874 novel set in Dorset wild environs to be too plot-centric, jumping from sub-plot to sub-plot without explanation, just to get Hardy's story told. In doing so, they sacrificed the depth of acting, characterization and storytelling that John Schlesinger's 1967 film adaptation was able to achieve. I wish they hadn't. I loved reading Hardy's book in high school, with all its' melodramatic twists and turns. His lengthy descriptions of the beautiful, but brutal, environment provided so much atmosphere as background to the emotional journey of his central character, Bathsheba Everdene, and her suitors. Bathsheba was definitely a departure from Jane Austen's "needy" women. This movie is not entirely lacking in those elements, but not nearly enough to capture the essence of Hardy's story...the unpredictability of human nature against nature itself. Schlesinger's film did a better job of portraying Hardy's theme, and besides his direction, I give credit to the stellar cast in his film, especially Julie Christie as Bathsheba and Alan Bates who played Gabriel Oak, her first suitor and eventual steadfast farm-hand and supporter. In the 2015 film, Bathsheba played by Carey Mulligan is dimply-cute and feistier than Christie's dramatization, but not as convincing in terms of the beauty and wantoness to get 3 guys on their knees! However, Mattias Schoenaerts comes across very well as the brooding guy who loves Bathsheba most, Gabriel Oak..he's a scruffier version of Ryan Gosling, and turns in a memorable performance.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Nice Clouds, Poop Movie
1 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was a huge disappointment in every way except seeing the clouds snake through the mountains in Switzerland. We went to see the film because of Juliette Binoche, lead actress, who we have seen in other films (most notably "Chocolat" and "English Patient") and found her performances to be memorable. The film was promoted with the theme of an aging actress dealing with her demons, but it never delivered on that score. And with an 124-minute run time, they could have explored her character more. We hear a little about.her impending divorce, her failed relationships with men in her industry, disillusionment about aging, and her drinking. All obvious demons, but none of them explored enough to allow her to emote and make me care about her. Instead, the story focuses exclusively on her conflict on performing as the "older woman" in a play she did 20 years before when she was the "younger woman". This theme is developed through her relationship with her personal assistant, played by Kristen Stewart, who, as a much younger woman, challenges her views in a dispassionate way. In that context, the two drink, smoke, "eff" a lot, and generally look and act more like men than women. But, amazingly, with all the obvious lesbian tension going on between them, this is never explored, and the film just fizzles out without acknowledging what it seemed to be about! I have read that Binoche liked the idea of this film and asked to have it produced, but unfortunately, they didn't take the time or have the gifts to make it a good film. I have to especially "ding" the editing, there were so many scenes where things just "jumped-cut" and were jarring. And Binoche's over-the-top laugh in many scenes were like "why are you laughing, huh?"
46 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Little Boy (2015)
8/10
Faith, Hope, Love & Stellar Acting
24 April 2015
I really enjoyed this movie! And it was good to see a winning entry from Mexico! The actors were all very good, even the big names like Emily Watson and Tom Wilkinson, who downplayed their parts and were real. The young actor who played central character was awesome, and I also loved the actor who played his Dad. And the actor who played the disenfranchised Japanese fellow was central to making the film believable and very moving. The storyline had a fantastical touch, but was thankfully not heavy-handed. Faith, family love and hope were main themes throughout, but never delivered in preachy way. Kudos to the director/writer for creating a strong story, hiring excellent actors, cinematic appeal in terms of locations, and ultimately delivering a movie that was stirring, thought-provoking and entertaining. My husband and I both enjoyed it so much, and we'll take our teen-aged daughter to see it again very soon.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Movie, Good Message to Remember
20 February 2015
We really enjoyed Mc Farland, and our 15 year-old daughter absolutely loved it! Comparing it to another recent Kevin Costner film, "Black & White", it's way better because Costner actually stands in the other guys shoes in this one, and the story is more engaging. I will remember the scenes where Coach and the kids are working in the fields! There are scenes that are really moving, bringing a few tears, because the actors are mostly unknown and do a good job of conveying the emotional journey from hopeless to hopeful through their commitment to cross-country running competition. Kevin Costner as Coach does a good job showing his evolution from dictatorial, angry coach with privileged athletes in a middle class culture to inspirational "father figure" coach with immigrant Hispanic kids who have the endurance to help their families as "pickers" in agricultural community while attending school at same time. It's a pretty straight-line plot without much theatricalism, which is refreshing and makes it worth seeing. Coach Costner's daughter Julie has some really good scenes, and she is perfect throughout especially during her 15th birthday "quincenera". A good family movie!
5 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good Piece with False Notes (Spoiler Alert)
30 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is as simplistic as its title "Black or White", and lacks authenticity in the writing, acting and plot development. In the beginning, there's on-screen mention of being inspired by a true story, but nothing provided at the end to identify whose story it was. The subject matter is timely and important in this race-baiting world we live in, but characters never developed enough to get beyond actors reading their lines, and doing the unlikely stuff they're directed to do. Three examples follow. First, the mixed race little girl, Eloise, who is the subject of the custody dispute, has lost her mother, father and grandmother, never shows in her expression or behavior any of the effects of the terrible tragedies that have befallen her. Second, her white Grandfather, Elliot, never exhibits the qualities that would make her want to stay with him so much. Played by Kevin Costner, he is unconvincing as both a grieving drunk guy and concerned grandparent. Swaying slightly through scenes and calling his long-time law partner's wife "Fudge" instead of "Fay" comes off as playing the role rather than really feeling the devastation of the recent death of his wife (we never find out why), the death of his young daughter in childbirth (again, we don't know why, and we see photo flashbacks of her, and would she ever be stupid enough to get pregnant by a crack-smoking criminal?) Third, the instigator of the custody battle, Rowena, the child's paternal grandmother, as played by Octavia Spencer, is a caricature of a bossy, controlling black Mama, with lots of wide-eyed officious bantering, demanding hugs and slapping her drug-addled son into submission. She's in danger of becoming "Medea" in a Tyler Perry movie rather than a first rate actress. Other scenes lacking credibility are the ones with the extended black family, all happy campers making dinner, watching TV, and playing instruments together one side of the street, while across the street, front porch crack-smoking is going on among Eloise's father and friends. At movie's conclusion, during the custody courtroom scenes, Elliott gets to unload in a moving speech, where Costner finally gets to use his acting chops. And, then turns over to his partner attorney a question to his granddaughter's shaky father on the witness stand, which is "how do you spell Eloise", and he botches it, so judge gives Elliott full custody. And all opposition fades away. Teary-eyed Elliott off to rehab, and Eloise visits cousins for two weeks. I wasn't bored,thank you, but this is a movie made for Lifetime TV, not the big screen. It's a subject that needs to be addressed, but could have been so much more thought-provoking and memorable!
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Big Eyes (I) (2014)
8/10
Entertaining Dramatic Comedy!
9 January 2015
This is a really fun, entertaining movie with an intriguing story, good acting, and a dose of 50's-60's nostalgia. Several well-crafted scenes evoked good memories of real places we used to go in San Francisco and madcap characters who were well-known in SF during its' mid-century heyday. Keane paintings and posters were everywhere, with people loving or hating them, but marketing strategies were breakthrough at the time, and I had no inkling of the duplicity behind the scenes! Amy Adams as Margaret Keane and Christopher Waltz as Walter Keane perform their starring roles as the most opposite husband and wife imaginable. Adams' character is all about the mystery of what's going on behind the almost-Stepford- wife countenance, while Waltz is fiendishly good displaying a borderline personality at its best (and worst!) I found that contrast fascinating, and it makes me want to dig further to find out more about real-life Margaret & Walter. So obsessed with painting her pictures, Margaret is especially intriguing as a real loner swept away by the super extroverted charm of a "fellow artist". That's what makes this movie so interesting. I'm not sure, but assume the film is billed as a "drama", but it has an exaggerated quality through script and acting that makes it comical at the same time. When I think of all the films I've seen, that duality makes "Big Eyes" unique. Producer Tim Burton did a movie years ago called I think "Big Fish" with Albert Finney, which had that same sense of drama & comedy and I love both of them. In my opinion, Burton is best when he is not trying so hard to be "odd". The result is touching instead.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed